Research on the Strategic Management of Faculty Stability in Universities under China's "Double First-Class" Initiative
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.70088/3mw52363Keywords:
higher education, faculty stability, brain drain, strategic management, talent managementAbstract
The "Double First-Class" initiative is a major strategic deployment in China's higher education sector, aimed at promoting the connotative development of universities and enhancing their international competitiveness. Talent is the primary resource and key support for achieving these construction goals. However, the advancement of this initiative has highlighted the problem of the disorderly flow of high-level academic talents. Eastern universities, leveraging economic advantages, have created a "siphon effect," causing severe brain drain in central and western institutions. Frequent, interest-driven job changes by high-level talents disrupt research teams, interrupt discipline construction, and undermine the balanced distribution of higher education resources, contradicting the initiative's original intent. Traditional management models relying on contract constraints offer only post-event control and fail to ensure talent stability. Therefore, the strategic management of faculty stability must transcend conventional approaches by integrating talent team construction into the overall university development strategy. This involves achieving value symbiosis between talents and universities through top-level design, systematic policy implementation, and long-term mechanism construction. In this context, "talent team stability" implies a reasonable structure, orderly flow, and alignment with the university's discipline construction plan, rather than absolute immobility. Furthermore, "strategic management" entails forward-looking planning, systematic layout, and dynamic adjustment to optimize talent resource allocation. This study explores these dimensions, offering a framework to address current talent flow challenges and promote the sustainable development of universities in alignment with national strategic needs.References
W. E. Boek, "Institutional Stability and Innovation in Higher Education," Journal of the Washington Academy of Sciences, pp. 11-21, 1973.
D. Maxey and A. Kezar, "The current context for faculty work in higher education," in *Envisioning the Faculty for the Twenty-First Century: Moving to a Mission-Oriented and Learner-Centered Model*, pp. 3-22, 2016.
S. Albalas, A. A'aqoulah, A. Alraoush, S. Ibdah, and N. Innab, "Factors Affecting the Stability of Faculty Members at Jordanian Public Universities."
V. J. Rosser, "Measuring the change in faculty perceptions over time: An examination of their worklife and satisfaction," Research in Higher Education, vol. 46, no. 1, pp. 81-107, 2005.
R. G. Ehrenberg and L. Zhang, "The changing nature of faculty employment," in *Recruitment, Retention and Retirement in Higher Education: Building and Managing the Faculty of the Future*, pp. 32-52, 2005.
D. Maxey and A. Kezar, "Revealing opportunities and obstacles for changing non-tenure-track faculty practices: An examination of stakeholders' awareness of institutional contradictions," The Journal of Higher Education, vol. 86, no. 4, pp. 564-594, 2015.
M. Burgan, What Ever Happened to the Faculty?: Drift and Decision in Higher Education. JHU Press, 2006.
S. Albalas, A. A'aqoulah, A. Alraoush, S. Ibdah, and N. Innab, "Factors affecting the stability of faculty members at Jordanian public universities," International Journal of Public Sector Performance Management, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 178-188, 2019.
S. N. Barringer and K. N. Pryor, "Understanding academic structure: variation, stability, and change at the center of the modern research university," The Review of Higher Education, vol. 45, no. 3, pp. 365-408, 2022.
R. P. Bringula, A. C. Balcoba, L. E. Alfaro, and J. Merritt, "Managing the perceived impact of K to 12 implementation on academic staff tenure and financial stability: Evidence from five higher education institutions in the Philippines," Educational Research for Policy and Practice, vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 181-200, 2019.
W. G. Bowen and E. M. Tobin, *Locus of Authority: The Evolution of Faculty Roles in the Governance of Higher Education*. 2015.
A. Neumann, *The Critical Faculty: Academic Leadership and the Quandary of Stability and Stress*. 1990.
B. Ghimire, R. K. Dahal, and D. Karki, "Job security and faculty commitment within higher education institutions," The International Research Journal of Management Science, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 14-27, 2023.
M. Doğan and H. Arslan, "Is the productivity of faculty members sustainable? The perspective of faculty members," Trends in Higher Education, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 356-372, 2024.
R. W. Shemky, "Catholic Higher Education: The Effect of the Academic Environment on the Stability of the Lay Faculty," The Journal of Higher Education, vol. 38, no. 2, pp. 70-77, 1967.
K. M. Moore and M. A. D. Sagaria, "Differential job change and stability among academic administrators," The Journal of Higher Education, vol. 53, no. 5, pp. 501-513, 1982.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Yuzhi Han (Author)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.









