Beyond Profession: On the Liberal Arts Value of Pedagogy

Authors

  • Weimeng Nong Guangzhou Institute of Science and Technology, Guangzhou, China Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.70088/a8d0v840

Keywords:

Pedagogy, Liberal arts education, The liberal arts value of pedagogy

Abstract

The liberal arts value of pedagogy has not been recognized by the public, only a very small number of scholars are aware of it, but that does not mean it is unimportant. Whether as educators or learners, everyone has the need for growth and development. The key to growth lies not in the breadth of knowledge, but in its interdisciplinary nature. The discipline of education serves as an important vehicle for helping people achieve this growth. Some Chinese pedagogy researchers argued that education should be made accessible to all-an inherent disciplinary characteristic of pedagogy itself that highlights the inherently interdisciplinary nature of pedagogy itself. This paper endorses this view and further elaborates on the liberal arts character of pedagogy, arguing that its reflective experience, educational thinking, and growth-oriented values can help learners develop a holistic understanding of themselves, others, and the world. However, instrumental rationality has constrained the disciplinary development of pedagogy; consequently, institutions engaged in pedagogical research must engage in disciplinary reflection and adjustment regarding curricular logic, pedagogical approaches, and educational spaces to fully leverage pedagogy's role in cultivating individuals' liberal arts literacy.

References

J. Wang, “On the rise and fall of education as an undergraduate major,” Zhejiang University Journal of Education, no. 1, pp. 77–85, 2024.

T. Cheng, “Separation or complementation—the relationship of disciplinary branches of educational science,” Journal of Hebei Normal University (Educational Science), no. 4, pp. 11–16, 2006.

H. Zhang and Z. Sun, “Research review on university general education in China,” Research in Higher Education of Engineering, no. 5, pp. 81–88, 2009.

Politics, B. Jowett, Trans. Kitchener, ON, Canada: Batoche Books, 1999, pp. 181–182.

Y. Zhou and Z. Zhou, “Hidden dialogue: The ideological debates of general education and liberal education,” Peking University Education Review, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 80–93+190, 2011.

F. Fuadaturrahmah, S. Ningtias, D. Setiari, et al., “Value and character education in the perspective of general education in higher education,” Education Achievement Journal of Science and Research, pp. 628–636, 2024.

C. A. Wells, Realizing General Education: Reconsidering Conceptions and Renewing Practice. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley Periodicals, Inc., 2016, (ASHE Higher Education Report, vol. 42, no. 2).

H. Hou and Z. Yuan, “On the popularization of pedagogy,” Theory and Practice of Education, vol. 41, no. 31, pp. 3–9, 2021.

H. Hou, “Pedagogy should move from ‘a study for teachers’ to ‘a study for everyone’,” China Social Sciences Net, Dec. 3, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://www.cssn.cn/skgz/bwyc/202512/t20251203_5953681.shtml. Accessed: Oct. 3, 2026.

Y. Cao, “Doing what, or knowing what to do: Crisis and reconstruction of teachers’ premise reflection of educational activities,” Journal of East China Normal University (Educational Sciences), vol. 32, no. 1, pp. 41–49, 2014.

Democracy and Education, J. Dewey, Ed. Stilwell, KS: Digireads.com Publishing, 2005, pp. 27–34.

H. Zhu, “The academy spirit of ‘education for becoming a person’ and its modern implications,” New Reading, no. 3, pp. 35–36, 2019.

Downloads

Published

10 October 2026

Issue

Section

Article

How to Cite

Nong, W. (2026). Beyond Profession: On the Liberal Arts Value of Pedagogy. Education Insights, 3(10), 7-12. https://doi.org/10.70088/a8d0v840