Regulatory Bypass and Look-Through Governance of Cross-Border U.S. Dollar Stablecoin Flows: A Fiat On- and Off-Ramp Approach

Authors

  • Meng Zhang School of Law, Beijing Foreign Studies University, Beijing, China Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.70088/5a2j5g07

Keywords:

dollar stablecoins, fiat on- and off-ramps, regulatory bypass, look-through governance, blockchain analytics, anti-money laundering

Abstract

Dollar stablecoins can transfer value across borders while detaching account-based identity and reporting data from the blockchain leg. Focusing on privately issued, fiat-backed dollar stablecoins that reach a China-facing fiat interface, this article defines regulatory bypass as a break in information continuity across the account-address-account sequence. The ledger can reveal a transaction path, and prohibition supplies the legal boundary, but intervention still requires proof of customer identity, wallet control, transaction purpose and conversion function. International standards assign duties by function and preserve originator, beneficiary, custody and transaction data across regulated segments, but gaps persist at self-hosted wallets, offshore providers and in the evidentiary use of blockchain analytics. The proposed framework allocates duties according to transaction control and information access. Banks and payment institutions investigate identifiable fiat links; converters and facilitators answer for the functions they perform; platforms, custodians and issuers preserve records within their control through lawful cross-border channels. A reviewable interface record should connect account data, wallet-control evidence, transaction hashes, conversion terms and corroborating off-chain material. Risk signals may trigger inquiry, but restrictions, freezing, liability or referral require progressively stronger corroboration and legally authorised procedures. This reconstructs regulatory continuity without treating technical traceability as proof by itself.

References

M. Reuter, Decrypting Crypto: How to Estimate International Stablecoin Flows, IMF Working Paper No. 2025/141, International Monetary Fund, Washington, DC, USA, 2025, doi: 10.5089/9798229016186.001.

Committee on Payments and Market Infrastructures (CPMI), Considerations for the use of stablecoin arrangements in cross-border payments, Bank for International Settlements, Basel, Switzerland, 2023.

T. Adrian et al., Understanding Stablecoins, IMF Departmental Paper No. 2025/009, International Monetary Fund, Washington, DC, USA, 2025, doi: 10.5089/9798229024075.087.

Financial Action Task Force (FATF), Targeted Report on Stablecoins and Unhosted Wallets -- Peer-to-Peer Transactions, FATF, Paris, France, 2026.

B. Hofmann, A. Mehrotra, and J. Paulick, Dollarisation and monetary control: what lessons for the rise of stablecoins?, BIS Working Papers No. 1370, Bank for International Settlements, Basel, Switzerland, 2026.

R. K. Lyons and G. Viswanath-Natraj, "What keeps stablecoins stable?," Journal of International Money and Finance, vol. 131, p. 102777, 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.jimonfin.2022.102777.

A. Ferreira, "The Curious Case of Stablecoins-Balancing Risks and Rewards?," Journal of International Economic Law, vol. 24, no. 4, pp. 755–778, 2021, doi: 10.1093/jiel/jgab036.

F. Cengiz, "Stablecoins and their regulation: a Hayekian approach," Journal of International Economic Law, vol. 28, no. 2, pp. 204–223, 2025, doi: 10.1093/jiel/jgaf014.

Financial Stability Board (FSB), *High-level Recommendations for the Regulation, Supervision and Oversight of Global Stablecoin Arrangements: Final report*, FSB, Basel, Switzerland, 2023.

Financial Action Task Force (FATF), *Updated Guidance for a Risk-Based Approach to Virtual Assets and Virtual Asset Service Providers*, FATF, Paris, France, 2021.

International Monetary Fund and Financial Stability Board, IMF-FSB Synthesis Paper: Policies for Crypto-Assets, International Monetary Fund and Financial Stability Board, Washington, DC, USA and Basel, Switzerland, 2023.

Financial Stability Board, *Thematic Review on FSB Global Regulatory Framework for Crypto-asset Activities: Peer review report*, FSB, Basel, Switzerland, 2025.

Financial Action Task Force (FATF), *International Standards on Combating Money Laundering and the Financing of Terrorism & Proliferation: The FATF Recommendations*, updated June 2026, FATF, Paris, France, 2012–2026.

Financial Action Task Force (FATF), *Targeted Update on Implementation of the FATF Standards on Virtual Assets and Virtual Asset Service Providers*, FATF, Paris, France, 2025.

Financial Stability Board, *Cross-border Regulatory and Supervisory Issues of Global Stablecoin Arrangements in EMDEs*, FSB, Basel, Switzerland, 2024.

B. Gu and T. Liu, "Enforcing International Financial Regulatory Reforms," Journal of International Economic Law, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 139–176, 2014, doi: 10.1093/jiel/jgu002.

S. L. Schwarcz, "Regulating Global Stablecoins: A Model-Law Strategy," Vanderbilt Law Review, vol. 75, no. 6, pp. 1729–1785, 2022.

M. Fröwis, T. Gottschalk, B. Haslhofer, C. Rückert, and P. Pesch, "Safeguarding the Evidential Value of Forensic Cryptocurrency Investigations," Forensic Science International: Digital Investigation, vol. 33, p. 200902, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.fsidi.2019.200902.

L. Ye and Y. Wu, "An Outline of 'Look-Through' Regulation in Financial Markets," Law Science, no. 12, pp. 12–21, 2017.

Y. Zheng, "Application and Restriction on 'Looking-Through Regulation': Financial Instrument, Systemic Risk and Regulation Boundary," Journal of Business Economics, no. 4, pp. 94–104, 2024, doi: 10.14134/j.cnki.cn33-1336/f.2024.04.008.

P. Liu, "On Blockchain Evidence," Chinese Journal of Law, no. 6, pp. 130–148, 2021.

H. Xing, "Are Financial Regulatory Measures a New Type of Administrative Act?," Peking University Law Journal, vol. 26, no. 3, pp. 730–746, 2014.

Downloads

Published

14 August 2026

Issue

Section

Article

How to Cite

Zhang, M. (2026). Regulatory Bypass and Look-Through Governance of Cross-Border U.S. Dollar Stablecoin Flows: A Fiat On- and Off-Ramp Approach. Financial Economics Insights , 3(3), 11-23. https://doi.org/10.70088/5a2j5g07