Exploring the Cultural Logic of the Eastward Spread of Western Learning and the Sinicization of Marxism

Authors

  • Rao Wu Liaoning Petrochemical University, Fushun, China Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.70088/rxp76653

Keywords:

cultural logic, sinicization, Western learning

Abstract

This review paper examines the cultural logic underpinning two historically intertwined intellectual movements: the eastward spread of Western learning and the sinicization of Marxism. It moves beyond descriptive chronology to analyze how epistemic frameworks, institutional mediation, and sociopolitical exigencies shape the reception, adaptation, and reconstitution of foreign ideas within Chinese intellectual history. The paper identifies recurring patterns---such as selective translation, conceptual grafting, and normative reinterpretation---that characterize knowledge transfer across civilizational boundaries. It distinguishes between instrumental adoption, where foreign theories serve immediate pragmatic ends, and structural integration, where they become embedded in indigenous categories of meaning and practice. Attention is given to the role of state-led ideological projects, academic institutions, and generational shifts in mediating theoretical importation. The analysis reveals that neither process operates through passive assimilation nor wholesale rejection; rather, both unfold as dialectical engagements wherein external doctrines are subjected to rigorous contextual calibration. This recalibration involves semantic realignment, historical anchoring, and ethical reframing---processes that transform imported systems into locally intelligible and politically functional paradigms. The paper further contends that the sinicization of Marxism cannot be understood apart from the longer arc of epistemic negotiation initiated by the eastward spread of Western learning, as both share underlying mechanisms of cultural translation and ideological domestication. By foregrounding continuity in method rather than rupture in content, the study offers a coherent framework for interpreting modern Chinese intellectual development as an internally consistent, culturally grounded project of theoretical innovation.

References

Y. Xiao, "Analysis of the logical path of Marxism sinicization under the mechanism of social adaptation promotion," Psychiatria Danubina, vol. 33, no. suppl. 8, pp. 445–446, 2021.

Y. Han, "The sinicization of Marxism in the 21st century," Philosophical Thought, no. 10, pp. 1–19, 2025.

G. Liu and X. Yang, "The dialectical relationship between Marx's sinicization and traditional Chinese culture," in Proc. 3rd Int. Conf. Educ., Sports, Arts Manage. Eng. (ICESAME), 2018, pp. 36–40.

X. Ye, "Cultural logic of Marx's philosophical revolution and its implications in modern times," Soc. Sci. China, vol. 29, no. 1, pp. 16–28, 2008.

Z. Chun and Z. Jun, "'The sinicization of western literary theory': From disciplinary formation to national strategy," Chin. Lit. Thought Today, vol. 56, no. 3–4, pp. 46–57, 2025.

Y. Huang, "An exploration of the sinicization of Marxism: The unity of theory and practice," Front. Humanit. Soc. Res., vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 152–161, 2025.

C. Liu, "On the successful experience of sinicization of Marxism since reform and opening up," J. Hum., Arts Soc. Sci., vol. 7, no. 3, 2020.

J. Solomon, *Sinicized Marxism as a Symptom of the Postcolonial Condition: Arif Dirlik, Mao Zedong, Xu Guangwei, and the Modern Regime of Translation*. Singapore: Springer Singapore, 2019.

Z. Liu, "Deeply understand the new leap in the sinicization of Marxism," J. Hum., Arts Soc. Sci., vol. 7, no. 3, 2023.

Downloads

Published

03 August 2026

Issue

Section

Article

How to Cite

Wu, R. (2026). Exploring the Cultural Logic of the Eastward Spread of Western Learning and the Sinicization of Marxism. Journal of Linguistics & Cultural Studies, 3(4), 44-52. https://doi.org/10.70088/rxp76653