Research on the International Translation, Introduction, and Communication Strategies of Haikou Historical and Cultural Symbols under the Background of the Free Trade Port
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.70088/bfrn2797Keywords:
cultural translation, heritage communication, Free Trade PortAbstract
This study investigates the international translation, introduction, and communication strategies employed for Haikou's historical and cultural symbols within the evolving context of the Hainan Free Trade Port. As a coastal capital with layered heritage—spanning Li and Miao indigenous traditions, maritime Silk Road legacies, colonial-era architecture, and revolutionary modern narratives—Haikou presents a complex semiotic landscape requiring nuanced cross-linguistic and cross-cultural mediation. The research adopts a tripartite analytical framework grounded in translational pragmatics, strategic communication theory, and symbolic geography. Field-based data collection included systematic documentation of multilingual signage, official promotional materials, museum interpretive texts, digital platforms, and guided tour narratives across twelve key heritage sites. Linguistic analysis focused on lexical selection, syntactic framing, cultural substitution patterns, and narrative hierarchy in English-language outputs. Findings reveal persistent asymmetries: over-reliance on literal translation obscures contextual meaning; selective symbol amplification privileges colonial and republican-era landmarks while marginalizing indigenous epistemologies and vernacular urban memory; and digital dissemination remains fragmented across institutional silos with inconsistent terminology and tonal registers. The study proposes a calibrated strategy of 'anchored adaptation'—a process that retains core cultural referents while dynamically adjusting explanatory depth, narrative sequencing, and multimodal emphasis according to target audience profiles and communicative contexts. This approach prioritizes semantic fidelity over lexical equivalence, foregrounds relational meaning over static representation, and embeds translation within broader institutional coordination mechanisms. The implications extend beyond Haikou to inform policy-integrated cultural communication frameworks for emerging free trade zones where heritage serves both identity consolidation and global positioning functions.References
T. Loulanski, "Revising the concept for cultural heritage: The argument for a functional approach," Int. J. Cult. Prop., vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 207–233, 2006.
C. Bortolotto, "From objects to processes: UNESCO's 'intangible cultural heritage'," J. Mus. Ethnogr., no. 19, pp. 21–33, 2007.
G. C. Spivak, "The politics of translation," in The Translation Studies Reader, L. Venuti, Ed. London, U.K.: Routledge, 2021, pp. 320–338.
K. Raj, "Go-betweens, travelers, and cultural translators," in A Companion to the History of Science, B. Lightman, Ed. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Blackwell, 2016, pp. 39–57.
M. Bouchenaki, "The interdependency of the tangible and intangible cultural heritage," in *Proc. 14th ICOMOS Gen. Assem. and Int. Symp.: 'Place, Memory, Meaning: Preserving Intangible Values in Monuments and Sites'*, Oct. 2003, pp. 27–31.
S. L. Mendoza, R. T. Halualani, and J. A. Drzewiecka, "Moving the discourse on identities in intercultural communication: Structure, culture, and resignifications," Commun. Q., vol. 50, no. 3–4, pp. 312–327, 2002.
M. J. Collier, "Cultural and intercultural communication competence: Current approaches and directions for future research," Int. J. Intercult. Relat., vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 287–302, 1989.
G. J. Ashworth, B. Graham, and J. E. Tunbridge, Pluralising Pasts: Heritage, Identity and Place in Multicultural Societies. London, U.K.: Pluto Press, 2007.
E. A. Gutt, Translation and Relevance: Cognition and Context. London, U.K.: Routledge, 2014.
M. I. Khan, "Translation: A Tool of Communication and Cultural Exchange," Strength Today Bright Hope Tomorrow, vol. 23, p. 48, Nov. 2023.
P. G. Ablett and P. K. Dyer, "Heritage and hermeneutics: Towards a broader interpretation of interpretation," Curr. Issues Tour., vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 209–233, 2009.
B. Buden, S. Nowotny, S. Simon, A. Bery, and M. Cronin, "Cultural translation: An introduction to the problem, and responses," Transl. Stud., vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 196–219, 2009.
R. Neather, "Museums as translation zones," in The Routledge Handbook of Translation and Globalization, M. Cronin, Ed. London, U.K.: Routledge, 2020, pp. 306–319.
B. McKercher and H. Du Cros, *Cultural Tourism: The Partnership Between Tourism and Cultural Heritage Management*. London, U.K.: Routledge, 2002.
D. A. Jameson, "Reconceptualizing cultural identity and its role in intercultural business communication," J. Bus. Commun., vol. 44, no. 3, pp. 199–235, 2007.
A. Chiapparini, "Communication and cultural heritage. Communication as effective tool for heritage conservation and enhancement," Commun. Cult. Herit. Rep., 2012.
F. E. Jandt, An Introduction to Intercultural Communication: Identities in a Global Community. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE, 2017.
J. House, Translation as Communication Across Languages and Cultures. London, U.K.: Routledge, 2015.
E. A. Weber, "Heritage interpretation as tool in cross-cultural communication: Challenges and solutions in the work of guides-interpreters," Heritage Interpretation Res. Rep., 2018.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Cuiting Gao (Author)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.









