Ecological Adaptation and Selection in Translating Huzhou Intangible Cultural Heritage Craft Terms: A Case Study
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.70088/pxt6z947Keywords:
Eco-translatology, three-dimensional transformation, intangible cultural heritage term, traditional craftsmanship, translation techniqueAbstract
Promoting China’s indigenous intangible cultural heritage (ICH) to the global audience has seen a spurt of progress recently, but empirical work on how translators actually handle traditional craft terms remains scarce. This study takes the local bilingual anthology Huzhou Intangible Cultural Heritage as a case, which examines the translation techniques used for ICH craft terms and the way they relate to the three-dimensional transformations in Eco-translatology. A corpus of 96 ICH craft term pairs was compiled through Python-driven extraction and manual verification. Two re-searchers coded each term independently using Molina and Albir’s taxonomy of translation tech-nique. The results show a clear asymmetry: Linguistic-dimension techniques dominate at 77.1%; cultural-dimension techniques account for 18.7%; communicative techniques appear only margin-ally, amounting to 3.1%. This pattern reflects the referential nature of craft terms. Many denote concrete objects, materials, or procedures that find close equivalents in English, making direct transfer the most economical option. However, when terms carry culturally specific meanings or risk obscurity, translators do resort to cultural elaboration or contextual restructuring. The findings caution against treating ICH translation as a uniform enterprise, and further suggest that ICH term type and semantic properties shape technique distribution, more than abstract principles of cultural preservation alone.References
UNESCO, “What is Intangible Cultural Heritage?” [Online]. Available: https://ich.unesco.org/en/what-is-intangible-heritage-00003. [Accessed: Jul. 11, 2026].
UNESCO, Basic Texts of the 2003 Convention for the Safeguarding of the Intangible Cultural Heritage. Paris, France: UNESCO, 2024.
L. Jiang, G. K. Sh. Al-Shaibani, F. Yang, M. Cheng, and M. Huang, “The metonymic mechanism of English translation of Chinese intangible cultural heritage terms from the perspective of cognitive psychology,” Frontiers in Psychology, vol. 13, 2022, Art. no. 957485.
Y. Shen, Huzhou Intangible Cultural Heritage, Y. Shen and Z. Duan, Trans. Hangzhou, China: Zhejiang Ancient Books Publishing House, 2020.
G. Hu, “Translation as adaptation and selection,” Perspectives, vol. 11, pp. 283–291, 2003.
G. Hu, An Approach to Translation as Adaptation and Selection. Wuhan, China: Hubei Education Press, 2004.
G. Hu, Eco-Translatology: Construction and Interpretation. Beijing, China: The Commercial Press, 2013.
G. Hu, Eco-Translatology: Towards an Eco-Paradigm of Translation Studies. Singapore: Springer Nature, 2020.
N. Chen, “A study of the English translation of herbalogical terminologies in the Chu ci from the perspective of eco-translatology,” M.A. thesis, Yangtze Univ., Jingzhou, China, 2022.
D. Cui and Y. Qin, “From the perspective of Eco-Translatology to analyze the cultural reflections on the English translation of the Qiang Minority Shibi-Drama,” International Journal of Languages, Literature and Linguistics, vol. 9, pp. 562–566, 2023.
X. Li, N. B. Sim, and Z. B. M. Zin, “Translation of Hmong folklore terms in Hmong oral epic ‘Creating Heaven and Earth’ from the perspective of Eco-Translatology,” Theory and Practice in Language Studies, vol. 14, pp. 3177–3185, 2024.
J. Wang, “On English translation of Chinese intangible cultural heritage terms from the perspective of typological terminology,” Journal of Anhui University of Technology (Social Sciences), vol. 39, pp. 48–51, 2022.
Z. Zheng and R. Liu, “Knowledge system as motivation in translating intangible cultural heritage terms: A case study of Chinese paper-cut,” China Terminology, vol. 24, pp. 85–91, 2022.
Z. Wang, “Study on the translation strategies of Nanchong shadow play’s ‘Going Overseas’ from the perspective of eco-translatology,” Frontiers in Humanities and Social Sciences, vol. 3, pp. 175–178, 2023.
S. Li and W. Hope, Terminology Translation in Chinese Contexts. London, U.K.: Routledge, 2021.
Translators Association of China, Guidelines for the Use of English in Cultural Heritage Areas, Standard T/TAC 12—2025, Translators Association of China, Beijing, China, 2025.
L. Molina and A. H. Albir, “Translation techniques revisited: A dynamic and functionalist approach,” Meta, vol. 47, pp. 498–512, 2002.
B. Kong, “A comparative study of Chinese and English textile-related cultural terms and their translation strategies,” Textile & Leather Review, vol. 9, pp. 5265–5287, 2026.
“Shuanglin silk damask,” China Daily Huzhou, Mar. 10, 2020. [Online]. Available: https://subsites.chinadaily.com.cn/huzhou/2020-03/10/c_408414.htm. [Accessed: Jul. 15, 2026].
J. House, Translation Quality Assessment: Past and Present. London, U.K.: Routledge, 2015.
Y. Dong, “Study on translation strategies of intangible cultural heritage from the perspective of eco-translatology,” Research on Literary and Art Development, vol. 3, pp. 8–11, 2022.
L. Hong, “A study on Chinese-English translation of intangible cultural heritage from the perspective of eco-translatology,” in Proc. 2018 2nd Int. Conf. Manage., Educ. Social Sci. (ICMESS 2018), Qingdao, China, 2018, pp. 1525–1528.
Q. Zhang, “Study on translation strategies of intangible cultural heritage projects from the perspective of eco-translatology—taking blue print cloth of Nantong as an example,” Modern Linguistics, vol. 13, pp. 368–373, 2025.
X. Jiang, “’Eco’ and ‘adaptation-selection’ in eco-translatology explained,” in Translation and Academic Journals, Y. Sun, Ed. New York, NY, USA: Palgrave Macmillan, 2015, pp. 135–148.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Yutao Lai, Wen Zhang (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
