Awareness of Fictionality and Cinematic Perception: Rethinking Plato's Critique of Mimesis through Film Spectatorship
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.70088/d64rcm34Keywords:
Plato, mimesis, awareness of fictionality, film spectatorship, cinematic perceptionAbstract
Film spectatorship combines awareness of fictionality with responses to what is seen and heard. Spectators know that events on the screen are fictional, yet cinematic form can still organize attention and expectation through viewpoint, narrative, sound, and rhythm, eliciting emotional and bodily responses. This experience provides a new basis for reconsidering Plato's critique of mimesis. Plato's account of the psychological power of mimesis remains illuminating: images exert force through the organization of perception even when spectators retain awareness of fictionality. Immediate responses during viewing, however, must be distinguished from changes in the order of the soul and in character, which also depend on the formation of viewing habits and their longer-term effects on judgments about reality. Spectatorial agency emerges in the capacity to recognize cinematic form, one's assigned viewing position, and one's own responses, thereby making renewed judgment possible.References
Plato, Republic, C. D. C. Reeve, Trans., Hackett Publishing Company, 2004.
S. Halliwell, The Aesthetics of Mimesis: Ancient Texts and Modern Problems, Princeton University Press, 2002.
J.-L. Baudry, “Ideological Effects of the Basic Cinematographic Apparatus,” Film Quarterly, vol. 28, no. 2, pp. 39–47, 1974–1975.
C. Metz, “The Fiction Film and Its Spectator: A Metapsychological Study,” New Literary History, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 75–105, 1976.
C. Radford, “How Can We Be Moved by the Fate of Anna Karenina?,” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, Supplementary Volumes, vol. 49, pp. 67–80, 1975.
K. L. Walton, “Fearing Fictions,” The Journal of Philosophy, vol. 75, no. 1, pp. 5–27, 1978.
M. Smith, “Film Spectatorship and the Institution of Fiction,” The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, vol. 53, no. 2, pp. 113–127, 1995.
C. Plantinga, Moving Viewers: American Film and the Spectator's Experience, University of California Press, 2009.
M. Chion, Audio-Vision: Sound on Screen, 2nd ed., C. Gorbman, Ed. and Trans., Columbia University Press, 2019.
C. Metz, The Imaginary Signifier: Psychoanalysis and the Cinema, C. Britton, A. Williams, B. Brewster, and A. Guzzetti, Trans., Indiana University Press, 1982.
A. Bazin, “Painting and Cinema,” in What Is Cinema?, vol. 1, H. Gray, Trans., University of California Press, 1967, pp. 164–169.
D. Andrew, What Cinema Is!: Bazin's Quest and Its Charge, Wiley-Blackwell, 2010.
C. Wheatley, Michael Haneke's Cinema: The Ethic of the Image, Berghahn Books, 2009.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Yiting Chai (Author)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.





