Ethical Perspectives on Resource Allocation in Local Public Hospitals
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.70088/evex3b89Keywords:
genetic testing, ethics, non-clinical settings, privacy, discriminationAbstract
In local infirmary, this review paper explores the perspective on resource allocation, addressing the complexness and challenge front in the dispersion of circumscribed healthcare resources. With an launching that sketch the meaning of honorable considerations in healthcare, peculiarly in public hospital where resourcefulness areconstrained, it begin. A overview increasingly ply setting for practices and honourable dilemmas, tracing the phylogeny of resource allocation strategies. Into two elemental orbit, the core themes dig : the honourable model pass resource allocation decisions and the encroachment of socioeconomic agent on these conclusion. A comparative psychoanalysis intrinsically spotlight the challenges front by hospitals in enforce ethical resource allocation, revealing disparity and issues. To raise fairness in resource distribution, future perspectives discuss possible reforms and modern feeler. The ending synthesise the findings, accentuate the pauperism for a advance that considers both ethical principles and hardheaded realities in resource allocation. This theme point to add to the ongoing discussion on healthcare ethics and inform policymakers and healthcare administrators about the grandness of ethical fabric in decisiveness-making summons.
References
A. K. Hawkins and A. Ho, "Genetic counseling and the ethical issues around direct to consumer genetic testing," J. Genet. Couns., vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 367--373, 2012.
W. Burke, L. E. Pinsky, and N. A. Press, "Categorizing genetic tests to identify their ethical, legal, and social implications," Am. J. Med. Genet., vol. 106, no. 3, pp. 233--240, 2001.
M. F. Martins, L. T. Murry, L. Telford, and F. Moriarty, "Direct-to-consumer genetic testing: an updated systematic review of healthcare professionals' knowledge and views, and ethical and legal concerns," Eur. J. Hum. Genet., vol. 30, no. 12, pp. 1331--1343, 2022.
M. M. Burgess, "Beyond consent: ethical and social issues in genetic testing," Nat. Rev. Genet., vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 147--151, 2001.
M. Parker and A. Lucassen, "Working towards ethical management of genetic testing," Lancet, vol. 360, no. 9346, pp. 1685--1688, 2002.
J. K. Williams, H. Skirton, and A. Masny, "Ethics, policy, and educational issues in genetic testing," J. Nurs. Scholarsh., vol. 38, no. 2, pp. 119--125, 2006.
G. Braverman, Z. E. Shapiro, and J. A. Bernstein, "Ethical issues in contemporary clinical genetics," Mayo Clin. Proc. Innov. Qual. Outcomes, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 81--90, 2018.
D. H. Lea, J. Williams, and M. P. Donahue, "Ethical issues in genetic testing," J. Midwifery Womens Health, vol. 50, no. 3, pp. 234--240, 2005.
E. T. Juengst, "Caught in the middle again: professional ethical considerations in genetic testing for health risks," Genet. Test., vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 189--200, 1997.
E. Niemiec, L. Kalokairinou, and H. C. Howard, "Current ethical and legal issues in health-related direct-to-consumer genetic testing," Personalized Med., vol. 14, no. 5, pp. 433--445, 2017.
B. M. Knoppers, "Confidentiality in genetic testing: legal and ethical issues in an international context," Med. L., vol. 12, p. 573, 1993.
C. Berg and K. Fryer-Edwards, "The ethical challenges of direct-to-consumer genetic testing," J. Bus. Ethics, vol. 77, no. 1, pp. 17--31, 2008.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Jessica Taylor (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
