From Formal Regulation to Operational Capacity: Asymmetric Adaptive Coordination in Deepfake Governance
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.70088/ah5fhc98Keywords:
deepfakes, AI governance, adaptive coordination, collaborative governance, operational capacity, public valueAbstract
Deepfake governance is often approached as a problem of technical detection, legal prohibition, or platform responsibility. Yet formal regulation and multi-actor participation do not necessarily translate into effective governance capacity. This article examines why formally dense governance arrangements can remain operationally weak through a qualitative comparison of the Huangshi AI voice-impersonation case and the Cangnan AI face-swapping case. Drawing on publicly available police, judicial and procuratorial materials, regulatory documents, authoritative news reports, and platform or industry sources, the study combines structured-focused comparison with process tracing. The analysis identifies four interconnected mechanisms: temporal mismatch between technological change and institutional updating; jurisdictional fragmentation across the harm chain; regulatory dependence arising from capability and information asymmetries; and incentive divergence that makes collaboration selective and episodic. The findings show that governance weakness arises not simply from the absence of rules or actors, but from failures to convert dispersed information into timely, verifiable, and coordinated action and to translate case responses into institutional learning. The article develops asymmetric adaptive coordination as a mechanism linking technological turbulence, distributed authority, unequal information control, and divergent incentives. It argues that effective deepfake governance depends less on adding rules or participants than on building capacities for timely coordination, auditability, learning, and correction while safeguarding security, privacy, due process, innovation, and public trust.References
R. Chesney and D. K. Citron, "Deep fakes: A looming challenge for privacy, democracy, and national security," California Law Review, vol. 107, pp. 1753–1819, 2019, doi: 10.2139/ssrn.3213954.
J. Kietzmann, L. W. Lee, I. P. McCarthy, and T. C. Kietzmann, "Deepfakes: Trick or treat?," Business Horizons, vol. 63, no. 2, pp. 135–146, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.bushor.2019.11.006.
R. Rini, "Deepfakes and the epistemic backstop," Philosophers' Imprint, vol. 20, no. 24, pp. 1–16, 2020.
C. Vaccari and A. Chadwick, "Deepfakes and disinformation: Exploring the impact of synthetic political video on deception, uncertainty, and trust in news," Social Media + Society, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 1–13, 2020, doi: 10.1177/2056305120903408.
Cyberspace Administration of China, *Provisions on the Administration of Deep Synthesis of Internet-Based Information Services*, 2022. [Online]. Available: https://www.cac.gov.cn/2022-12/11/c_1672221949354811.htm
Cyberspace Administration of China, *Interim Measures for the Management of Generative Artificial Intelligence Services*, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://www.cac.gov.cn/2023-07/13/c_1690898327029107.htm
Cyberspace Administration of China, Measures on the Identification of AI-Generated Synthetic Content, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://www.cac.gov.cn/2025-03/14/c_1743654684782215.htm
A. Firc, K. Malinka, and P. Hanáček, "Deepfakes as a threat to a speaker and facial recognition: An overview of tools and attack vectors," Heliyon, vol. 9, no. 4, p. e15090, 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e15090.
M. Westerlund, "The emergence of deepfake technology: A review," Technology Innovation Management Review, vol. 9, no. 11, pp. 39–52, 2019, doi: 10.22215/timreview/1282.
T. Gillespie, *Custodians of the Internet: Platforms, Content Moderation, and the Hidden Decisions That Shape Social Media*. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 2018.
R. Gorwa, R. Binns, and C. Katzenbach, "Algorithmic content moderation: Technical and political challenges in the automation of platform governance," Big Data & Society, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 1–15, 2020, doi: 10.1177/2053951719897945.
J. P. Quintais, N. Appelman, and R. Ó Fathaigh, "Using terms and conditions to apply fundamental rights to content moderation," German Law Journal, vol. 24, no. 5, pp. 881–911, 2023, doi: 10.1017/glj.2023.53.
R. Broadhurst, "Developments in the global law enforcement of cyber-crime," Policing: An International Journal of Police Strategies & Management, vol. 29, no. 3, pp. 408–433, 2006, doi: 10.1108/13639510610684674.
T. Legrand and C. Leuprecht, "Securing cross-border collaboration: Transgovernmental enforcement networks, organized crime and illicit international political economy," Policy and Society, vol. 40, no. 4, pp. 565–586, 2021, doi: 10.1080/14494035.2021.1975216.
J. D. Thompson, M. N. Zald, and W. R. Scott, Organizations in Action: Social Science Bases of Administrative Theory. London, U.K.: Routledge, 2017.
T. Burns and G. M. Stalker, The Management of Innovation, 3rd ed. Oxford, U.K.: Oxford University Press, 1994.
S. Park, D. S. Lee, and J. Son, "Regulatory reform in the era of new technological development: The role of organizational factors in the public sector," Regulation & Governance, vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 894–908, 2021, doi: 10.1111/rego.12339.
H. W. J. Rittel and M. M. Webber, "Dilemmas in a general theory of planning," Policy Sciences, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 155–169, 1973, doi: 10.1007/BF01405730.
R. Agranoff, Managing within Networks: Adding Value to Public Organizations. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press, 2007.
H. Wang and B. Ran, "Network governance and collaborative governance: A thematic analysis on their similarities, differences, and entanglements," Public Management Review, vol. 25, no. 6, pp. 1187–1211, 2023, doi: 10.1080/14719037.2021.2011389.
C. Ansell and A. Gash, "Collaborative governance in theory and practice," Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, vol. 18, no. 4, pp. 543–571, 2008, doi: 10.1093/jopart/mum032.
L. Poppo and T. Zenger, "Do formal contracts and relational governance function as substitutes or complements?," Strategic Management Journal, vol. 23, no. 8, pp. 707–725, 2002, doi: 10.1002/smj.249.
P. S. Ring and A. H. Van de Ven, "Developmental processes of cooperative interorganizational relationships," Academy of Management Review, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 90–118, 1994, doi: 10.2307/258836.
A. L. George and A. Bennett, Case Studies and Theory Development in the Social Sciences. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2005.
D. Collier, "Understanding process tracing," PS: Political Science & Politics, vol. 44, no. 4, pp. 823–830, 2011, doi: 10.1017/S1049096511001429.
J. Gerring, Case Study Research: Principles and Practices. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press, 2007.
S. L. Benaine, "Performance gaming: A systematic review of the literature in public administration and other disciplines with directions for future research," International Journal of Public Sector Management, vol. 33, no. 5, pp. 497–517, 2020, doi: 10.1108/IJPSM-07-2019-0191.
A. Taeihagh, "Governance of generative AI," Policy and Society, vol. 44, no. 1, pp. 1–22, 2025, doi: 10.1093/polsoc/puaf001.
A. C. Inkpen and S. C. Currall, "The coevolution of trust, control, and learning in joint ventures," Organization Science, vol. 15, no. 5, pp. 586–599, 2004, doi: 10.1287/orsc.1040.0079.
S. S. Lui and H.-Y. Ngo, "The role of trust and contractual safeguards on cooperation in non-equity alliances," Journal of Management, vol. 30, no. 4, pp. 471–485, 2004, doi: 10.1016/j.jm.2004.02.002.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Jing Shi (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
