Research on S-Dimension ESG Disclosure of White Goods Enterprises from the Perspective of Social Responsibility Decoupling: Multi-case Evidence from Midea, Haier Smart Home and Gree Electric
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.70088/ejd7hq53Keywords:
esg disclosure, social responsibility, corporate governance, corporate disclosure, content analysis, greenwashingAbstract
Existing research on ESG misrepresentation has focused largely on environmental greenwashing, whereas false disclosure in the social (S) dimension, which covers employee rights, public welfare, philanthropy, and supply chain human rights, remains inadequately discussed. This form of false disclosure, termed S-dimension ESG washing, is highly concealed because it primarily relies on subjective textual narratives. Three leading A-share listed companies in the white goods industry—Midea Group, Haier Smart Home, and Gree Electric Appliances—are selected as a multi-case sample. A comparative framework is constructed to contrast textual statements in corporate reports with evidence of actual business operations. Five typical manifestations of S-dimension washing are identified, and a dual driving mechanism composed of external institutional pressures and internal governance deficiencies is systematically analyzed. The findings reveal that five types of disclosure decoupling—selective disclosure, vague language, publicity-driven philanthropy, labor information embellishment, and rhetorical supply chain commitments—are present to varying degrees. Under homogeneous external pressures, differences in internal governance patterns determine the specific manifestation of washing strategies; notably, the more concealed the cultural narrative underlying the washing, the less hard evidence can be captured publicly. Ultimately, this study provides a valuable reference for regulators to refine S-dimension disclosure rules, for third-party rating agencies to optimize evaluation indicators, and for listed companies to standardize social responsibility reporting practices. Furthermore, it highlights the urgent need for enhanced transparency mechanisms to mitigate symbolic corporate behaviors.References
J. F. Solomon, A. Solomon, N. L. Joseph, and S. D. Norton, "Impression management, myth creation and fabrication in private social and environmental reporting: Insights from Erving Goffman," Accounting, Organizations and Society, vol. 38, no. 3, pp. 195–213, 2013.
D. Diouf and O. Boiral, "The quality of sustainability reports and impression management: A stakeholder perspective," Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, vol. 30, no. 3, pp. 643–667, 2017.
J. Bothello, I. Ioannou, V. A. Porumb, and Y. Zengin‐Karaibrahimoglu, "CSR decoupling within business groups and the risk of perceived greenwashing," Strategic Management Journal, vol. 44, no. 13, pp. 3217–3251, 2023.
C. Del Gesso and R. N. Lodhi, "Theories underlying environmental, social and governance (ESG) disclosure: a systematic review of accounting studies," Journal of Accounting Literature, vol. 47, no. 2, pp. 433–461, 2025.
M. F. Alsayegh, R. Abdul Rahman, and S. Homayoun, "Corporate economic, environmental, and social sustainability performance transformation through ESG disclosure," Sustainability, vol. 12, no. 9, p. 3910, 2020.
G. Giannarakis, G. Konteos, and N. Sariannidis, "Financial, governance and environmental determinants of corporate social responsible disclosure," Management Decision, vol. 52, no. 10, pp. 1928–1951, 2014.
V. Kandpal, A. Jaswal, E. D. Santibanez Gonzalez, and N. Agarwal, "Corporate social responsibility (CSR) and ESG reporting: Redefining business in the twenty-first century," in *Sustainable Energy Transition: Circular Economy and Sustainable Financing for Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) Practices*, Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland, 2024, pp. 239–272.
M. Karwowski and M. Raulinajtys‐Grzybek, "The application of corporate social responsibility (CSR) actions for mitigation of environmental, social, corporate governance (ESG) and reputational risk in integrated reports," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, vol. 28, no. 4, pp. 1270–1284, 2021.
T. L. Hazen, "Social issues in the spotlight: The increasing need to improve publicly-held companies' CSR and ESG disclosures," U. Pa. J. Bus. L., vol. 23, p. 740, 2020.
A. Helfaya, R. Morris, and A. Aboud, "Investigating the factors that determine the ESG disclosure practices in Europe," Sustainability, vol. 15, no. 6, p. 5508, 2023.
E. Pollman, "Corporate social responsibility, ESG, and compliance," Cambridge Handbook of Compliance, D. D. Sokol and B. van Rooij, Eds., Cambridge University Press, forthcoming. Loyola Law School, Los Angeles Legal Studies Research Paper No. 2019-35, 2019.
K. Albitar, K. Hussainey, N. Kolade, and A. M. Gerged, "ESG disclosure and firm performance before and after IR: The moderating role of governance mechanisms," International Journal of Accounting & Information Management, vol. 28, no. 3, pp. 429–444, 2020.
B. Mukhtar, M. K. Shad, L. F. Woon, M. Haider, and A. Waqas, "Integrating ESG disclosure into the relationship between CSR and green organizational culture toward green innovation," Social Responsibility Journal, vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 288–304, 2024.
E. Loew, G. Erichsen, B. Liang, and M. L. Postulka, "Corporate social responsibility (CSR) and environmental social governance (ESG)–disclosure of European banks," 2021.
C. S. D. S. Lokuwaduge and K. Heenetigala, "Integrating environmental, social and governance (ESG) disclosure for a sustainable development: An Australian study," Business Strategy and the Environment, vol. 26, no. 4, pp. 438–450, 2017.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Huiran Xing, Zeyu Zhang (Author)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.









