Highland Wisdom: A Study on the Acceptance and Application of Generative AI in Teaching Among Primary and Secondary School Teachers in a Western Highland Region of China

Authors

  • Jile Zibu School of Education, Xizang University, Lhasa, China Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.70088/rgwkfn86

Keywords:

generative artificial intelligence, technology acceptance, primary and secondary education, western highland region of china, teacher attitudes, instructional innovation, educational digitalization

Abstract

As generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) rapidly penetrates the field of education, the extent to which primary and secondary school teachers accept and use it in instructional practice has become an issue of growing scholarly and policy concern. Given the relative scarcity of empirical research on this topic in frontier ethnic minority regions of western China, this study focuses on primary and secondary school teachers in a western highland region and employs a questionnaire survey to conduct an exploratory investigation. A total of 40 valid questionnaires were collected. Using reliability analysis, descriptive statistics, and Pearson correlation analysis, the study examines teachers’ responses across the following dimensions: performance expectancy, effort expectancy, social influence, facilitating conditions, hedonic motivation, technology anxiety, technology trust, behavioral intention, relative advantage/task fit, and compatibility. The findings indicate that teachers in this region generally hold positive attitudes toward the use of GenAI in teaching. Scores for performance expectancy, hedonic motivation, and relative advantage/task fit are comparatively high, and behavioral intention remains at a moderately high level overall. Correlation analysis reveals that behavioral intention is significantly and positively correlated with performance expectancy, social influence, compatibility, hedonic motivation, and relative advantage/task fit, with the relationship between relative advantage/task fit and behavioral intention being the most pronounced. By contrast, technology anxiety does not exhibit a significant correlation with behavioral intention. These results suggest that teachers’ continued intention to use GenAI is more substantially grounded in perceived instructional value, task alignment, and organizational support than in technology-related anxiety, offering preliminary insights for designing teacher support frameworks for intelligent technology adoption in ethnic minority regions.

References

E. Klopfer, J. Reich, H. Abelson, and C. Breazeal, "Generative AI and K-12 education: An MIT perspective," 2024.

M. Belkina, S. Daniel, S. Nikolic, R. Haque, S. Lyden, P. Neal, ... and G. M. Hassan, "Implementing generative AI (GenAI) in higher education: A systematic review of case studies," Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, vol. 8, p. 100407, 2025.

E. M. Rogers, A. Singhal, and M. M. Quinlan, "Diffusion of innovations," in An integrated approach to communication theory and research, Routledge, 2014, pp. 432-448.

E. J. G. Eusebio, P. Baldera, A. M. C. Patiam, E. R. Villanueva, N. A. Gaa, A. M. F. Solis, ... and A. L. Ribon, "AI in the classroom: A systematic review of barriers to educator acceptance," International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, vol. 24, no. 9, pp. 126-147, 2025.

J. Qadir, "Engineering education in the era of ChatGPT: Promise and pitfalls of generative AI for education," in 2023 IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference (EDUCON), 2023, pp. 1-9.

S. Akgun and C. Greenhow, "Artificial intelligence in education: Addressing ethical challenges in K-12 settings," AI and Ethics, vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 431-440, 2022.

J. Manczka, "A phenomenological study: Teacher perceptions of generative artificial intelligence and its impact on teaching and learning in high schools," Point Park University, 2024.

M. V. Shamkina, "AI in education: top applications, real-life examples, and adoption tips," 2023.

J. Kim, "Perceptions and preparedness of K-12 educators in adopting generative AI," Research in Learning Technology, vol. 33, 2025.

B. Gökbulut, "Enhancing Pre-Service Teachers’ AI-TPACK Through Sustainable Development Goals: A Mixed-Methods Study on AI-Supported Web 2.0 Tools," Sustainability, vol. 18, no. 6, p. 2963, 2026.

R. Chen, V. R. Lee, and M. G. Lee, "A cross-sectional look at teacher reactions, worries, and professional development needs related to generative AI in an urban school district," Education and Information Technologies, vol. 30, no. 11, pp. 16045-16082, 2025.

V. Venkatesh, M. G. Morris, G. B. Davis, and F. D. Davis, "User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view," MIS Quarterly, vol. 27, no. 3, pp. 425-478, 2003.

R. Sandhu, H. K. Channi, D. Ghai, G. S. Cheema, and M. Kaur, "An introduction to generative AI tools for education 2030," in Integrating generative AI in education to achieve sustainable development goals, 2024, pp. 1-28.

K. Aletras, "Impacts on Education and Teaching from the Advance of Artificial Intelligence in Secondary Schools," European Journal of Engineering and Technology Research, pp. 16-22, 2023.

G. L. Blackburn, "Teaching, learning, doing: best practices in education," The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, vol. 82, no. 1, pp. 218S-221S, 2005.

Downloads

Published

30 March 2026

Issue

Section

Article

How to Cite

Zibu, J. (2026). Highland Wisdom: A Study on the Acceptance and Application of Generative AI in Teaching Among Primary and Secondary School Teachers in a Western Highland Region of China. Education Insights, 3(3), 235-245. https://doi.org/10.70088/rgwkfn86