Development and Validation of a Process-Based Assessment System for E-Commerce Curricula: A Hybrid AHP--FCE Approach

Authors

  • Jin Wang School of Economics and Management, Guangdong Technology College, Zhaoqing, China Author
  • Qian Zhang School of Economics and Management, Guangdong Technology College, Zhaoqing, China Author
  • Bo Li School of Economics and Management, Guangdong Technology College, Zhaoqing, China Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.70088/a0canq11

Keywords:

process-based assessment, analytic hierarchy process, e-commerce education, instructional design, teaching evaluation, curriculum optimization

Abstract

This study proposes the Process-Based Assessment System (PBAS) tailored specifically for "theory-practice" integrated curricula, utilizing the E-commerce major in application-oriented universities as a comprehensive case study. As higher education increasingly emphasizes practical competencies alongside theoretical knowledge, traditional evaluation metrics often fall short in capturing the multifaceted nature of student development. To address this critical gap, the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) is employed to systematically determine the precise weights of various evaluation indices, ensuring a balanced and objective assessment framework. Furthermore, the system's practical feasibility and educational impact are rigorously validated through extensive empirical evidence gathered from classroom implementations. The quantitative and qualitative results demonstrate that by seamlessly integrating observable student behaviors, interactive learning processes, and internal cognitive mechanisms, the PBAS successfully achieves both longitudinal tracking and transversal interaction throughout the entirety of the students' learning journey. This hierarchical, progressive, and highly dynamic evaluation model effectively reflects the continuous development of students' knowledge transfer capabilities. Moreover, it meticulously tracks nuanced learning behaviors, thereby significantly stimulating academic engagement and fostering a culture of autonomous, self-directed learning among students. Consequently, the proposed framework provides a robust, data-driven basis for continuous curriculum optimization through deep pedagogical reflection. Ultimately, the findings highlight that the PBAS demonstrates superior practical applicability, enhanced educational value, and greater scientific rigor when directly compared to conventional, outcome-focused assessment methods.

References

J. M. Russell, C. Baik, A. T. Ryan, and E. Molloy, "Fostering self-regulated learning in higher education: Making self-regulation visible," Active Learning in Higher Education, vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 97–113, 2022.

M. Leenknecht, L. Wijnia, M. Köhlen, L. Fryer, R. Rikers, and S. Loyens, "Formative assessment as practice: The role of students’ motivation," Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, vol. 46, no. 2, pp. 236–255, 2021.

P. Black and D. Wiliam, "Classroom assessment and pedagogy," Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, vol. 25, no. 6, pp. 551–575, 2018.

L. Anwar, M. J. Goedhart, and A. Mali, "Learning trajectory of geometry proof construction: Studying the emerging understanding of the structure of Euclidean proof," Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, vol. 19, no. 5, p. em2266, 2023.

B. B. Ndlovu, "Exploring teachers’ practices when using formative assessment in improving quality education," Cogent Education, vol. 12, no. 1, p. 2451489, 2025.

E. Panadero, H. Andrade, and S. Brookhart, "Fusing self-regulated learning and formative assessment: A roadmap of where we are, how we got here, and where we are going," The Australian Educational Researcher, vol. 45, no. 1, pp. 13–31, 2018.

J. Wu and X. Yu, "The influence of formative assessment on academic performance: Exploring the role of teachers’ emotional support," Frontiers in Psychology, vol. 16, p. 1567615, 2025.

S. B. M. Hanefar, N. Anny, and S. Rahman, "Enhancing teaching and learning in higher education through formative assessment: Teachers’ perceptions," International Journal of Assessment Tools in Education, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 61–79, 2022.

J. Kwan, "Students’ views on the use of formative assessment and feedback for learning at higher education in Singapore during the COVID-19 pandemic," Biomedical Journal of Scientific & Technical Research, vol. 58, no. 4, pp. 50751–50775, 2024.

S. K. Banihashem, D. Gašević, and O. Noroozi, "A critical review of using learning analytics for formative assessment: Progress, pitfalls and path forward," Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, vol. 41, no. 3, p. e70056, 2025.

R. Morris, T. Perry, and L. Wardle, "Formative assessment and feedback for learning in higher education: A systematic review," Review of Education, vol. 9, no. 3, p. e3292, 2021.

K. Nicola‐Richmond, N. Ward, S. Logan, N. Lyons, and R. Ajjawi, "Evaluative judgement in practice education: How does the ability to judge the quality of work impact placement performance?," Australian Occupational Therapy Journal, vol. 71, no. 2, pp. 291–301, 2024.

X. Xu, W. Shen, A. Y. M. Islam, and Y. Zhou, "A whole learning process-oriented formative assessment framework to cultivate complex skills," Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 1–15, 2023.

E. Van Niekerk, P. Ankiewicz, and E. De Swardt, "A process-based assessment framework for technology education: A case study," International Journal of Technology and Design Education, vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 191–215, 2010.

D. Cecilio-Fernandes, J. Sandars, R. Gianotto-Oliveira, and N. Steenhof, "Teaching for transfer of learning in health professions education: AMEE Guide No. 176," Medical Teacher, vol. 47, no. 8, pp. 1243–1251, 2025.

S. Brown, R. Rhomsen, and H. Al-Farouqi, "Evaluating the use of learning analytics in formative assessment," International Journal of Post Axial: Futuristic Teaching and Learning, pp. 204–213, 2025.

A. Fatmawati, P. Purnawarman, and D. Sukyadi, "Formative assessment and self-regulated learning during pandemic era," Tell: Teaching of English Language and Literature Journal, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 72–85, 2021.

N. Gupta, K. Ali, D. Jiang, T. Fink, and X. Du, "Beyond autonomy: Unpacking self-regulated and self-directed learning through the lens of learner agency—a scoping review," BMC Medical Education, vol. 24, no. 1, p. 1519, 2024.

R. Clayton Bernard and G. Kermarrec, "Peer-and self-assessment in collaborative online language-learning tasks: The role of modes and phases of regulation of learning," European Journal of Psychology of Education, vol. 40, no. 1, p. 7, 2025.

M. C. Iglesias Pérez, J. Vidal-Puga, and M. R. Pino Juste, "The role of self and peer assessment in higher education," Studies in Higher Education, vol. 47, no. 3, pp. 683–692, 2022.

Y. Cai and K. Xing, "Examining the mediation of engagement between self-efficacy and language achievement," Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, vol. 46, no. 3, pp. 893–905, 2025.

J. Qian and D. Li, "Toward a better understanding of student engagement with peer feedback: A longitudinal study," International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, vol. 63, no. 1, pp. 709–734, 2025.

O. Kryshko, M. Becker, J. Fleischer, and D. Leutner, "Self-regulation of motivation in university students–a longitudinal study of interindividual differences and intraindividual trajectories," Learning and Individual Differences, vol. 125, p. 102817, 2026.

T. L. Saaty, "How to make a decision: The analytic hierarchy process," European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 48, no. 1, pp. 9–26, 1990.

Downloads

Published

30 April 2026

Issue

Section

Article

How to Cite

Wang, J., Zhang, Q., & Li, B. (2026). Development and Validation of a Process-Based Assessment System for E-Commerce Curricula: A Hybrid AHP--FCE Approach. Education Insights, 3(4), 330-346. https://doi.org/10.70088/a0canq11