Research on the Optimization of Junior High School Physics Experiment Teaching from the Perspective of Teaching-Learning-Assessment Consistency
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.70088/g8kvdm50Keywords:
educational consistency, physics education, experiment teaching, teaching strategies, evaluation system, curriculum reformAbstract
This paper clarifies the fundamental connotation of the Teaching-Learning-Assessment Consistency framework and explores its critical alignment with junior high school physics experiment teaching. In the current educational landscape, traditional experiment teaching often suffers from significant defects, including a disconnect between theoretical instruction and practical application, inadequate student engagement, and fragmented evaluation methods that fail to capture comprehensive learning outcomes. Targeting these inherent limitations, this study proposes systematic and comprehensive optimization strategies structured across three primary dimensions. First, it emphasizes curriculum standard-oriented teaching objective decomposition, ensuring that every experimental activity is directly anchored to overarching educational goals. Second, it advocates for diversified experimental activity design, which incorporates inquiry-based learning, collaborative projects, and hands-on problem-solving to stimulate student interest and active participation. Third, it details the construction of a multi-dimensional evaluation system that continuously monitors student progress through formative and summative assessments, thereby closing the feedback loop between teaching and learning. The proposed practice framework can effectively improve overall teaching efficiency, bridge the gap between theoretical knowledge and practical execution, and cultivate students' core competencies in physics, such as critical thinking, scientific inquiry, and analytical reasoning. Ultimately, this research provides a robust theoretical foundation and a highly actionable reference for advancing physics experiment teaching reform under the rigorous demands of the new curriculum standards.References
N. Papadouris and C. P. Constantinou, "Formative assessment in physics teaching and learning," in The Role of Laboratory Work in Improving Physics Teaching and Learning, Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2018, pp. 71-81.
B. Clare, "Promoting deep learning: A teaching, learning and assessment endeavour," Social Work Education, vol. 26, no. 5, pp. 433-446, 2007.
C. Stathopoulou and S. Vosniadou, "Exploring the relationship between physics-related epistemological beliefs and physics understanding," Contemporary Educational Psychology, vol. 32, no. 3, pp. 255-281, 2007.
C. Wieman and K. Perkins, "Transforming physics education," Physics Today, vol. 58, no. 11, pp. 36-41, 2005.
N. Munfaridah, L. Avraamidou, and M. Goedhart, "The use of multiple representations in undergraduate physics education: what do we know and where do we go from here?," Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, vol. 17, no. 1, em1934, 2021.
S. Nulhaq and A. Setiawan, "Influences of Multiple Representation in Physics Learning to Students in Understanding Physics Material and Scientific Consistency," in *2015 International Conference on Innovation in Engineering and Vocational Education*, Atlantis Press, Nov. 2015, pp. 235-238.
C. Henderson and M. H. Dancy, "Teaching, learning and physics education research: Views of mainstream physics professors," in AIP Conference Proceedings, vol. 790, no. 1, American Institute of Physics, Sep. 2005, pp. 109-112.
P. Nieminen, "Representational Consistency and the Learning of Forces in Upper Secondary school physics," Jyväskylä Studies in Education, Psychology and Social Research, no. 470, 2013.
S. Blömeke and R. V. Olsen, "Consistency of results regarding teacher effects across subjects, school levels, outcomes and countries," Teaching and Teacher Education, vol. 77, pp. 170-182, 2019.
M. Asriadi AM, S. Hadi, E. Istiyono, E. Purnama, and A. I. Sanam, "Assessing the Accuracy and Consistency of Formative Assessment Instruments in Physics: A Validity and Reliability Study," *International Journal of Educational Reform*, vol. 10567879261440527.
K. T. Kotsis, "Persistent Misconceptions in Physics Education Across Educational Levels: Patterns, Instructional Responses, and Future Directions," European Journal of Contemporary Education and E-Learning, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 185-197, 2026.
K. Mukaddas, "THE ACTUALITY OF THE PRINCIPLE OF CONSISTENCY IN THE TEACHING OF PHYSICS," European Science Review, no. 7-8, pp. 3-5, 2021.
R. J. Shavelson, "Some aspects of the correspondence between content structure and cognitive structure in physics instruction," Journal of Educational Psychology, vol. 63, no. 3, pp. 225, 1972.
O. Ates, G. U. Coban, and S. K. Sengoren, "Consistency between constructivist profiles and instructional practices of prospective physics teachers," European Journal of Educational Research, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 359-372, 2018.
J. V. Aalst, "An introduction to physics education research," Canadian Journal of Physics, vol. 78, no. 1, pp. 57-71, 2000.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Zhiya Chen (Author)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.








