The Logic Positioning and Reform Path of College Student Affairs Management in the New Era
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.70088/vxzrn067Keywords:
student affairs, higher education, empirical research, educational reform, data governanceAbstract
In the new era context, the characteristics of college student populations exhibit significant generational shifts. Post-00s and post-05s students have undergone profound transformations in their core values, behavioral patterns, and overall demand structures, making traditional student affairs management models increasingly inadequate. To address these emerging complexities, this study conducts comprehensive empirical research on the current challenges, underlying influencing mechanisms, and potential optimization pathways in university student affairs management. Based on a robust dataset comprising 2,476 valid questionnaires collected from 31 universities across China, alongside in-depth qualitative interview data from 12 diverse higher education institutions, the analysis provides a multifaceted evaluation of the current landscape. Findings reveal that overall satisfaction scores for student affairs management average only 3.42 out of 5. Furthermore, there are notable gaps in the delivery of precision services, psychological support, and targeted employment assistance when compared to student expectations. The analysis identifies three core variables—professionalism of management teams, data governance capabilities, and interdepartmental collaboration efficiency—which account for 22.7%, 18.9%, and 16.3% of the variance in management effectiveness, respectively. Consequently, the study proposes an integrated reform framework combining ideological guidance, data-driven decision-making, diversified service provision, and comprehensive team capacity building. This approach offers actionable solutions for achieving high-quality student affairs management. Ultimately, these conclusions not only enrich the local theoretical framework for student affairs management but also provide vital empirical evidence for strategic policy formulation in higher education institutions.References
X. Liu, "Transformation Logic and Practical Challenges in University Student Affairs Management in the Digital Era," Journal of Modern Educational Theory and Practice, vol. 2, no. 8, 2025.
Z. Lv, "Research on optimization and application of university student development and management strategy driven by multidimensional big data," Scientific Programming, vol. 2022, no. 1, Art. no. 6538069, 2022.
D. Sundar, Y. Jayaram, and J. Bhat, "Generative AI Frameworks for Digital Academic Advising and Intelligent Student Support Systems," *International Journal of Artificial Intelligence, Data Science, and Machine Learning*, vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 128-138, 2024.
R. Minthorn and A. F. Chavez, Indigenous leadership in higher education, Routledge, 2014, pp. 19-23.
A. W. Astin and H. S. Astin, Leadership reconsidered: Engaging higher education in social change, 2000.
G. S. McClellan and J. M. Kiyama, Eds., The handbook of student affairs administration, John Wiley & Sons, 2023.
G. D. Kuh, "What student affairs professionals need to know about student engagement," Journal of College Student Development, vol. 50, no. 6, pp. 683-706, 2009.
P. G. Love and S. M. Estanek, Rethinking student affairs practice, John Wiley & Sons, 2004.
P. Hiraldo, "The role of critical race theory in higher education," The Vermont Connection, vol. 31, no. 1, p. 7, 2010.
J. H. Schuh, J. P. Biddix, L. A. Dean, and J. Kinzie, Assessment in student affairs, John Wiley & Sons, 2016.
M. B. B. Magolda, *Making their own way: Narratives for transforming higher education to promote self-development*, Routledge, 2023.
M. J. Mayhew, A. N. Rockenbach, N. A. Bowman, T. A. Seifert, and G. C. Wolniak, How college affects students: 21st century evidence that higher education works, John Wiley & Sons, 2016.
S. R. Jones, V. Torres, and J. Arminio, *Negotiating the complexities of qualitative research in higher education: Fundamental elements and issues*, Routledge, 2013.
S. R. Harper, "Student engagement in higher education," in S. J. Quaye, Ed., Student Engagement in Higher Education, Routledge, New York and London, 2009, p. 1.
J. M. Braxton, A. S. Hirschy, and S. A. McClendon, *Understanding and reducing college student departure: ASHE-ERIC higher education report, volume 30, number 3*, John Wiley & Sons, 2011.
C. S. Claxton and P. H. Murrell, *Learning Styles: Implications for Improving Educational Practices. ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Report No. 4, 1987*, Association for the Study of Higher Education, Washington, DC, 1987.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Wei Zhao (Author)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.








